The item sums up all the details of the trial before it goes to retrial on the grounds that the patent is unlawful. It is undated but the paper is watermarked 1837.
Item appears to be undated notes of an opinion offered by Cress Cresswell and R. Atkinson who represented the Marshalls in an earlier stage of the Kay case.
Item appears to be undated notes of an opinion offered by Cress Cresswell and R. Atkinson who represented the Marshalls in an earlier stage of the Kay case.
The item explains how Philippe de Girard's invention works comparing it to Horace Hall's patent of 1814. There is no date but presumably it was made for the trial.